JOB-ORDER
COSTING
Exercise 5-44 Direct
Method of Support Department Cost Allocation
a. Calculate
the allocation ratios for Power and General Factory
Battery Small
Motors
Power : 7,000/(7,000+1,000)
0.875 -
1,000/(7,000+1,000) - 0.125
General Factory : 5,000/(5,000+15,000)
0.25 -
15,000/(5,000+15,000) - 0.75
b. Allocate
the Support Services Cost to the Operating Divisions
|
|
Support
Departments
|
|
Operating Divisions
|
||
|
|
Power
|
General
Factory
|
|
Battery
|
Small
Motors
|
|
Overhead Cost
|
$
160,000
|
$ 430,000
|
|
$ 163,000
|
$ 84,600
|
|
Power
|
(160,000)
|
-
|
|
140,000
|
20,000
|
|
General
Factory
|
-
|
(430,000)
|
|
107,500
|
322,500
|
|
|
0
|
0
|
|
410,500
|
427,100
|
c. Assume
Divisonal Overhead Rates are based on Direct Labor Hours. Calculate the
Overhead Rate for the Battery Division and for the Small Motors Divisions.
·
Overhead Rate for the Battery Division = 163,000 = 9.06 per DLH
18,000
·
Overhead Rate for the Small Motors
Divisions = 84,600 = 1.42 per DLH
60,000
Problem
5-50 Overhead Rates, Unit Costs
|
Welding
Assembly Finishing
Total
|
||
|
Estimates Overhead $ 220,000 $
62,000 $ 150,000
$ 432,000
Direct Labor Hours 4,500 10,000 20,500
20,500
Direct Labor Cost 90,000 150,000 360,000
360,000
Machine Hours 5,000 1,000 8,000
8,000
|
||
|
Job 1 Job 2
|
||
|
Direct Materials $
6,725 $ 9,340
Direct Labor Cost 1,800 3,100
Direct Labor Hours
Welding 10 10
Assembly 60 20
Finishing 20 70
Number of Machine Hours
Welding 50 50
Assembly 60 25
Finishing 90 125
|
||
|
Total $ 8,825 $ 12,740
|
||
1.
Calculate a plantwide rate for Folsom Company
Based on machine hours. What is the bid price of each job using this rate?
Plantwide rate for Folsom Company Based on machine hours:
Machine Hours__ = $ 8,000
= $0.4 per Direct Labor Hours
Direct
Labor Hours $20,500
Bid price of the Job 1 = Total Manufacturing Cost + (Typical Bid Price)
(Departement Overhead Rates)
=
$ 8,825 + (
$ 8,825 x 35%) (
0.4 )
=
$ 8,825 + (
$ 3,089 ) ( 0.4 )
=
$ 8,825 +
$ 1,236
=
$ 10,061
Bid price of the Job 2 = Total Manufacturing Cost + (Typical Bid Price)
(Departement Overhead Rates)
=
$ 12,740 + (
$ 12,740 x 35% ) ( 0.4 )
= $
12,740
+ ( $ 4,459 ) ( 0.4 )
=
$ 12,740 +
$ 1,784
=
$ 14,524
2.
Calculate departmental overhead rates for the
producing departments. What is the bid price of each job using these rates?
Departmental overhead rates for the producing
departments:
Estimated
Overhead = $
43,200 = 2.10 per Direct Labor Hours
Direct
Labor Hours $ 20,500
Bid price of the Job 1 = Total Manufacturing Cost + (Typical Bid Price)
(Departement Overhead Rates)
=
$ 8,825 + (
$ 8,825 x 35%) (
2.10 )
=
$ 8,825 + (
$ 3,089 ) ( 2.10 )
=
$ 8,825 +
$ 6,489
=
$ 15,331
Bid price of the Job 2 = Total Manufacturing Cost + (Typical Bid Price)
(Departement Overhead Rates)
=
$ 12,740 + (
$ 12,740 x 35%)
( 2.10 )
=
$ 12,740 + (
$ 4,459 ) ( 2.10 )
=
$ 12,740 + $ 9,364
=
$ 22,104
Problem 5-54 Predetermined Overhead Rates, Variances, Cost
Flows
1.
Assuming that overhead is applied on
the basis of direct labor cost, what was the overhead rate used during the
first quarter of the year?
Applied Overhead = Direct Labor
Cost x Overhead Rate
$ 140,000 = $ 80,000 x Overhead Rate
Overhead Rate
= $ 140,000 / $ 80,000
Overhead Rate
= 1.75 atau 175 %
2.
What was the applied overhead for the
first quarter? The actual overhead? The under or overapplied overhead?
Applied
Overhead = $ 140,000
Actual Overhead = $ 138,500
Overlapplied
Overhead = $ 1,500
3.
What was the cost of the goods
manufactured for the quarter?
Direct materials $ 40,000
Direct labor 80,000
260,000
Add: Beginning work in process 17,000
Cost of goods manufactured $ 245,000
4.
Assume that the overhead variance is
closed to the cost of goods sold account. Prepare the journal entry to close out the overhead
control account. What is the adjusted balance in Cost if Goods Sold?
Overhead Control $ 1,500
Cost of Goods Sold
1,500
Adjusted cost of goods sold: 210,000
( 1,500)
5.
For Job 32, identify the costs incurred for direct
materials, direct labor, and overhead.
Direct Materials ($32,000 – $10,000 – $17,500) $
4,500
Direct Labor (1,000 × $10) 10,000
Ending work in process $ 32,000
Problem 5-58 Support Department Cost
allocation: Comparison of Methods of Allocation
|
|
Support Departments
|
Producing
Departments
|
||
|
Maintenance
|
Power
|
Drilling
|
Assembly
|
|
|
Overhead costs
|
$ 320,000
|
$ 400,000
|
$ 163,000
|
$ 90,000
|
|
Machine hours
|
-
|
22,500
|
30,000
|
7,500
|
|
Kilowatt-hours
|
40,000
|
-
|
36,000
|
324,000
|
|
Direct labor hours
|
-
|
-
|
5,000
|
40,000
|
1.
Prepare bids for Bender by using each
of the following allocation methods (allocation power costs first)
a. Direct Method
|
Drilling
|
Assembly
|
|
|
Machine : 30,000/(30,000+7,500)
|
0.80
|
-
|
|
7,500/(30,000+7,500)
|
-
|
0.20
|
|
Power : 36,000/(36,000+324,000)
|
0.10
|
-
|
|
324,000/(36,000+324,000)
|
-
|
0.90
|
|
Support Departments
|
Producing
Departments
|
|||||||
|
Maintenance
|
Power
|
Drilling
|
Assembly
|
|||||
|
Direct costs
|
$ 320,000
|
$ 400,000
|
$ 163,000
|
$ 90,000
|
||||
|
Machine (a)
|
(320,000)
|
-
|
256,000
|
64,000
|
||||
|
Power (b)
|
-
|
(400,000)
|
40,000
|
360,000
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
0
|
$ 0
|
$ 459,000
|
$ 514,000
|
||||
|
Catatan :
|
||||||||
|
(a)
Machine: Drilling :
0.80 x $320,000 = $256,000
|
||||||||
|
Assembly : 0.20
x $320,000 = $ 64,000
|
||||||||
|
(b) Power : Drilling : 0.10 x $400,000
= $ 40,000
|
||||||||
|
Assembly : 0.90
x $400,000 = $360,000
|
||||||||
·
Department Drilling : Overhead Rate = $459,000 : 30,000 mhrs = $15.3 per machine
hour. Product cost and price :
Prime cost $
18.17
Total unit cost $
64.07
·
Bid Price = $64.07 x 1.15 = $73.6805
b.
Sequentoal
Method
|
|
Maintenance
|
Drilling
|
Assembly
|
|
Machine : 30,000/(30,000+7,500)
|
-
|
0.80
|
-
|
|
7,500/(30,000+7,500)
|
-
|
-
|
0.20
|
|
Power : 40,000/(40,000+36,000+324,000)
|
0.10
|
-
|
-
|
|
36,000/(40,000+36,000+324,000)
|
-
|
0.09
|
-
|
|
324,000/(40,000+36,000+324,000)
|
-
|
-
|
0.81
|
|
|
Support Departments
|
Producing
Departments
|
|||||||
|
|
Maintenance
|
Power
|
Drilling
|
Assembly
|
|||||
|
Direct costs
|
$ 320,000
|
$ 400,000
|
$ 163,000
|
$ 90,000
|
|||||
|
Machine (a)
|
(360,000)
|
-
|
288,000
|
72,000
|
|||||
|
Power (b)
|
40,000
|
(400,000)
|
36,000
|
324,000
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 487,000
|
$ 486,000
|
|||||
|
Catatan
:
|
|||||||||
|
(a) Machine : Drilling : 0.80 x ($320,000 +
$40,000) = $288,000
|
|||||||||
|
Assembly : 0.20 x ($320,000 +
$40,000) = $72,000
|
|||||||||
|
(b) Power
: Maintenance : 0.10 x $400,000
= $40,000
|
|||||||||
|
Drilling : 0.09 x $400,000
= $36,000
|
|||||||||
|
Assembly : 0.81 x $400,000
= $324,00
|
|||||||||
·
Department Drilling : Overhead Rate =
$487,000 : 30,000 mhrs = $16.2333
Prime cost $ 18.17
Overhead (3x $16.2333) $ 48.6999
·
Bid Price = $34.4033 x 1.15 = $39.5638
- Which method most accurately reflects the cost of producting the front-end assemblies, Why?
Metode yang paling akurat menurut saya dalam kasus
tersebut adalah metode langsung. Metode
langsung adalah metode yang
sangat simpel dan cara yang paling mudah untuk mendukug biaya-biaya dalam
departemen. Selain itu
metode langsung juga tidak saling berpengaruh terhadap biaya yang lain. Metode langsung juga hanya
memberikan dukungan biaya terhadap departemen produksi. Sehingga biaya-biaya dalam
depertemen pendukung menjadi nol (habis) untuk dialokasikan ke departemen
produksi. Selain
itu, metode langsung juga
memungkinkan untuk mendapatkan keuntungan
yang lebih besar, di mana harga yang ditawarkan lebih tinggi dibandingkan
dengan metode percontohan. Hal ini
sebabkan karena dalam metode langsung, biaya dalam departemen pendukung (power
dan machine) dialokasikan secara keseluruhann ke departemen produksi, sementara
dalam metode bertahap, biaya power dalam departemen pendukung dialokasikan
terlebih dahulu ke departemen pendukung (machine) dan ke depertemen produksi
(grinding dan assembly) kemudian deprtemen pendukung (biaya machine)
dialokasikan ke departemen produksi (grinding dan assembly).
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
komen o yo rek,, *suwun